Sunday, February 9, 1997 7:26:28 PM Message From: The Hotline Users Mailing,Hotline@lists.fwparker.org,Internet Subject: The Hotline Users Digest #33 - 02/09/97 To: Geoff Le Feuvre The Hotline Users Mailing List ,Internet The Hotline Users Digest #33 - Sunday, February 9, 1997 Re: That was mature! by Kevin Ying Re: A few more suggestions by PYRo Re: That was mature! Kevin and Phil please read by Sorry! by Re: Sorry! by Re: The Secret Order of the Festive Squirrelz!!!! by Kristin Ohnstad Re: Friggin Losers Ruin HL by (tupper) Re: Sorry! by Cerberus Multiple connections by E_M_E_R_G_E_N_C_Y by Marc Gray Re: Multiple connections by Cerberus Re: Multiple connections by Phil Hilton ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: That was mature! From: Kevin Ying Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 18:00:43 +0900 (JST) No matter how good your ideas appear to be, repeating the same message SIX TIMES to the listserv is sure to get you auto-cancelled off any mailing list. YES... we heard it the first time... we didn't need to get spammed six more times to hear all about your little wonderful idea. Your idea is not transparent. It actually requires someone to put information correctly twice. When using IRC, ircle, or Homer for the first time, newbies don't have to enter anything. Sure, they get a silly default nickname but most of the time, his peers tell the new user what to do... or you RTFM. If other listers want to discuss your idea, then they will post to the list and spark a discussion. Notice how those who have discussed ideas replied to messages they decided were worth replying to and those they didn't consider as such did not receive a general reply. Same goes for my message, Hinks' messages, Phil's messages, etc. That's what a discussion list is for. If you're so "manly", then why can't you accept the fact that no one else but yourself has publicly recognized that your idea is a sound one? You're really starting to sound ALOT like someone named Karl... On Sun, 9 Feb 1997 pramsey@mail.tds.net wrote: > That was really mature Phil, canceling me from the mailing list like > that. I don't stop that easy, not at all. Go ahead and cancel me again > if you wish, I'll just subscribe again and again and again. If you make > a filter for my messages, I'll just switch to a new address. I already > said I was done with this, by canceling me you have caused me to send > this message, wasting my and everyone elses time. Why don't you face me > like a man? Instead of like a boy. You have your own mailing list, USE > IT, give some ideas! My idea of forms doesn't scare away newbies, YOU > DO. > > The way I see it, you haven't posted one idea about the way to fix the > ban problems and until you do I don't think you have any right to cancel > people from the mailing list just because you can't handle people having > ideas you don't. Thats a really really bad way to view life, it will > cause you to lose your friends, jobs and you hurt Hotline by it. > > You are truely a wizard, the wizard of oz. > > Ok, I think I have wasted enof time on this so I close with the > following few words, "I just wonder how many other people you cancel > because you don't like what they say." > ~~~ Kevin Ying Medical Bank Institute Chief System Administrator INAC Building, 5-18-23 Roppongi kevin@medbank.or.jp Minato-ku, Tokyo 106, Japan (voice) 81-3-5570-7000 (fax) 81-3-5570-7100 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: A few more suggestions From: "PYRo" Date: 8 Feb 97 01:40:56 +0000 --Cyberdog-AltBoundary-0009D55F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable this is a really good idea.... (FROM TOGTOG) > >Make it so people who want to use HL have to fill out a form with there >name and email address then you or a script takes the persons name, >email address and encodes it, making a long number out of it, like >35644235532563. >Then you or the script emails the person the code within 5 minutes(while >they are waiting they can be downloading HL). >Ok so now the person has there code, now they lauch HL and it asks for >there name and code, they enter the info and hit the OK button. >HL now stores that number in a pref file, in the System Folder, and in >ANY HL launched, making it VERY hard to delete the code. > >Every time HL is launched the number will be loaded into memory. > >If an admin wants to ban the person for a time then all they have to do >is click on the persons name, click the ban button and the code is >recored on a list on the server. >When the person trys to reconnect to the server, the server checks the >code and if it matches they get a friendy message saying "Sorry but you >have been banned from this server for _ minutes, please try again then" > > --Cyberdog-AltBoundary-0009D55F Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Cyberdog-MixedBoundary-0009D560" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --Cyberdog-MixedBoundary-0009D560 Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 12Palatinothis is a really good idea.... (FROM TOGTOG) > >Make it so people who want to use HL have to fill out a form with there >name and email address then you or a script takes the persons name, >email address and encodes it, making a long number out of it, like >35644235532563. >Then you or the script emails the person the code within 5 minutes(while >they are waiting they can be downloading HL). >Ok so now the person has there code, now they lauch HL and it asks for >there name and code, they enter the info and hit the OK button. >HL now stores that number in a pref file, in the System Folder, and in >ANY HL launched, making it VERY hard to delete the code. > >Every time HL is launched the number will be loaded into memory. > >If an admin wants to ban the person for a time then all they have to do >is click on the persons name, click the ban button and the code is >recored on a list on the server. >When the person trys to reconnect to the server, the server checks the >code and if it matches they get a friendy message saying "Sorry but you >have been banned from this server for _ minutes, please try again then" > >12Palatino --Cyberdog-MixedBoundary-0009D560-- --Cyberdog-AltBoundary-0009D55F-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: That was mature! Kevin and Phil please read From: pramsey@mail.tds.net Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 05:28:29 -0500 =95=95=95=95 This isn't really a flame but it is long, so please take the= time to read ALL of it so all this crap makes sense, k? >No matter how good your ideas appear to be, repeating the same message=20 >SIX TIMES to the listserv is sure to get you auto-cancelled off any >mailing list. >YES... we heard it the first time... we didn't need to get >spammed six more times to hear all about your little wonderful idea.=20 Sorry, I was simply replying to all the ban and ghost threads, didn't mean to spam, won't happen again. >Your idea is not transparent. It actually requires someone to put=20 >information correctly twice. When using IRC, ircle, or Homer for the=20 >first time, newbies don't have to enter anything. Very good points but Hotline isn't IRC, maybe it would be better to wait with the banning feature until more people joined. What do you think? >If other listers want to discuss your idea, then they will post to the=20 >list and spark a discussion. Notice how those who have discussed ideas=20 >replied to messages they decided were worth replying to and those they=20 >didn't consider as such did not receive a general reply. Same goes for=20 >my message, Hinks' messages, Phil's messages, etc. That's what a=20 >discussion list is for. >If you're so "manly", then why can't you accept the fact that no one els= e=20 >but yourself has publicly recognized that your idea is a sound one? =20 >You're really starting to sound ALOT like someone named Karl... I never clamed to be manly, I never said I couldn't accept the fact that no one else but myself had publicly recognized my idea, what I COULDN'T accept was the fact them no one said anything really about my idea, no one commented on it. I also COULDN'T accept that the head admin of this mailing list(Phil), didn't even take the time to read my message. You write a very very good letter, maybe Phil could learn something from you, maybe I could too. I feel the need to explain WHY I posted my idea a second time and why I flamed Phil. I wrote what I still think is a very good idea and posted it. Soon after posting that, Phil basically told everyone to shutup about all the ban, ghost stuff. Good bans ARE needed but it seemed to me because Phils server is Macline and ML uses accounts that he doesn't really care if bans are ever put in but other people including myself feel that they are very much needed. After he told everyone to shut up, I wrote a flame to him for that. Then his big comeback was reposting the 1 1/2 cons of my idea in a message, I could very easily tell that he didn't read the whole post. I CLEARLY explained a few key points and some how Phil missed them completely. So I flamed him a second time for not even taking 30 seconds to read my message. It was Phils bad reading that caused this whole thing to blow up, I was done posting but he just had to get his in. Again I clearly state that I am sorry for posting my idea 6 times BUT I'll burn in hell before I am sorry for flaming Phil, he had it coming. PHIL, THIS NOTES FOR YOU> Phil, I could tell you didn't read my message so I would have to say that you didn't read very many other peoples messages, you read the first line, then the last line and you TRY to guess what was in the middle of the message. You should NEVER reply to and/or flame a post if you haven't read ALL OF IT, IF you don't understand something, DON'T flame the person, ask them to explain the parts you don't understand. Sorry to make this so long, I should be done now, unless something else happens :/ -togtog ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Sorry! From: pramsey@mail.tds.net Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 10:11:07 -0500 I don't say sorry often in private and even less in public but I do feel the need to say sorry to this mailing list so SORRY! Phil has privately emailed me and he at last explained some of the inter workings of the mailing list. I just might shut my trap for awhile *cheers from everyone*. I hope I didn't ruin this mailing list, goodbye. -togtog ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Sorry! From: pramsey@mail.tds.net Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 11:35:16 -0500 >Paul, Leah, >I'm really sorry that I haven't written you lately, I haven't been >home. You could have emailed me and told me that sooner. Oh well. >I got my car and we've been out every night getting crap to go in it. crap to go in it? What crap? Won't that make it smell? :) >I'm not mad at you either... I'M SO GLAD *HUGS* >It doesn't bother me that you live in a R.V. either... :) >what made you think I would care about that? Lets just say its an idea my mom put in my head a while back. >You are still a cool person no matter where you live. Thank you! I think you're pretty cool yourself :) >And of course I still want to talk to you. :) >If you want to give me your # and I can call you on the phone sometime. My number is 777-0133 but I should tell you something, there is ZERO privatecy here to talk and the phone is busy when ever I am up, because I'm on the net. Maybe you and me could go talk alone someplace, your house maybe, a park, somewhere. I should also warn you that I am the SHYEST person you will EVER meet so I may not say much, same goes for the phone, I haven't talked to anyone on the phone for like 8 years. You are the first person in 8 years that I have met so there is a lot of fear in me, A LOT. Thats part of the reason I went so nuts when you didn't write back, I thought I screwed up my last chance to be with a girl for a while. >Well we are fixing to leave again, talk to you later. See ya, have fun!! >Love ya, >Leah Love ya too, Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: The Secret Order of the Festive Squirrelz!!!! From: Kristin Ohnstad Date: Sun, 9 Feb 97 12:25:45 -0000 heheheeh I wanna meet you ya nut = D ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Friggin Losers Ruin HL From: milk@best.com (tupper) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 11:02:51 -0700 >Also, I'm not going to be adding domain bans and wildcards. Simply >banning of a SINGLE ip address for 30 minutes (after which time it is >automatically removed). I think it's terrible that it gets removed after 30 minutes. I think it should be definable if not perminant till an admin removes it. __ ich bin milk milk@best.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Sorry! From: Cerberus Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 11:24:57 -0800 Is it just me or does this message have nothing to do with hotline. togtog, didja send this to the wrong address? I just wanted to say that I read some of this past thread and togtog, I think it was very mature of you to apologize for your actions. If we had more people who could take responsibility when we screwed up, we would be in a better society. >>Paul, >Leah, > >>I'm really sorry that I haven't written you lately, I haven't been >>home. >You could have emailed me and told me that sooner. Oh well. > >>I got my car and we've been out every night getting crap to go in it. >crap to go in it? What crap? Won't that make it smell? :) > >>I'm not mad at you either... >I'M SO GLAD *HUGS* > >>It doesn't bother me that you live in a R.V. either... >:) > >>what made you think I would care about that? >Lets just say its an idea my mom put in my head a while back. > >>You are still a cool person no matter where you live. >Thank you! I think you're pretty cool yourself :) > >>And of course I still want to talk to you. >:) > >>If you want to give me your # and I can call you on the phone sometime. >My number is 777-0133 but I should tell you something, there is ZERO >privatecy here to talk and the phone is busy when ever I am up, because >I'm on the net. Maybe you and me could go talk alone someplace, your >house maybe, a park, somewhere. I should also warn you that I am the >SHYEST person you will EVER meet so I may not say much, same goes for >the phone, I haven't talked to anyone on the phone for like 8 years. You >are the first person in 8 years that I have met so there is a lot of >fear in me, A LOT. Thats part of the reason I went so nuts when you >didn't write back, I thought I screwed up my last chance to be with a >girl for a while. > >>Well we are fixing to leave again, talk to you later. >See ya, have fun!! > >>Love ya, >>Leah > >Love ya too, >Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Multiple connections From: s143303@studenti.ing.unipi.it Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 22:33:01 +0100 I'd like to see in the newer hotline client (b20) the possibility to make many connections to different sites without launching multiple copies of Hotline Client (like it is now). It's very tedious ! Is this option included in b20 Hotline ? Let me know, please. Fabrizio ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: E_M_E_R_G_E_N_C_Y From: Marc Gray Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 17:25:53 -0400 >DEAR FRIENDS, > THE FOLLOWING NOTICE I RECEIVED FROM AN EXTREMELY REPUTABLE FRIEND IN >MY INTERNET GROUP. HE IS A CONSULTANT TO MICROSOFT. THIS EFFECTS US ALL!!! > THANKS FOR LISTENING-YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO > >>I don't often post, but when I see something this important... >> >>This is a critical issue. Please register your comments, as this could >almost kill us off! >> >>>>Forward this to everyone you know who uses the net - >>>> >>>>FYI >>>> >>>>Your local telephone company has filed a proposal with the FCC to impose >>>>per minute charges for your Internet service. They contend that your usage >>>>has or will hinder the operation of the telephone network. >>>> >>>>The FCC has created an email box for your comments, responses must be >>>>received by February 13, 1997. Send your comments to isp@fcc.gov and tell >>>>them what you think. >>>> >>>>Every phone company is in on this one, and they are trying to sneak it in >>>>just under the wire for litigation. Let everyone you know hear this one. >>>>Send this e-mail address to everyone you can think of. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Multiple connections From: Cerberus Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 14:59:05 -0800 >I'd like to see in the newer hotline client (b20) the possibility to make >many connections to different sites without launching multiple copies of >Hotline Client (like it is now). It's very tedious ! >Is this option included in b20 Hotline ? >Let me know, please. > >Fabrizio Compared with other programs like fc, just having to duplicate the program is wonderful (for example, fc has to duplicate an entire folder (about 5 megs for a hundred filez). one 500k file is wonderful ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Multiple connections From: Phil Hilton Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 18:30:00 -0500 >I'd like to see in the newer hotline client (b20) the possibility to make >many connections to different sites without launching multiple copies of >Hotline Client (like it is now). It's very tedious ! >Is this option included in b20 Hotline ? >Let me know, please. > >Fabrizio Nope... probably won't be done either... Hotline doesn't have one main window, so it has no way of clearly defining what server is for what window, without causing alot of cunfusion. Yes, you could always look in the title bar, but how many people actually do? Netscape has the ability to open 2 browsers because it uses one main window. It's just not ethical for Hotline to do multiple connections with it's current GUI. Maybe hinks will alter it in the future, but last i knew, the idea was dropped. And how is it "very tedious"??? open up as many copies as you want, and use the finder menu to switch amung them... no problem! :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- End of The Hotline Users Digest --- Internet Message Header Follows --- Received: from macline.fwparker.org by bertrand.ccs.carleton.ca (SMI-8.6/SMI-4.0) id TAA05727; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 19:30:22 -0500 Message-Id: <199702100030.TAA05727.5727@bertrand.ccs.carleton.ca> From: The Hotline Users Mailing List To: The Hotline Users Mailing List Subject: The Hotline Users Digest #33 - 02/09/97 Date: Sun, 9 Feb 97 18:26:28 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: Bulk X-ListServer: LetterRip 1.0.1 by Fog City Software, Inc.